Masters Dissertation+Discussion

Masters Dissertation+Discussion-29
The form of your chapters should be consistent with this story and its components.Contents: For many kinds of research, the main work of interpretation cannot be done until most of the data has been collected and analysed.

Tags: Essay Classroom Management PlanUni AssignmentMath Homework 3rd GradeHumor EssayReflective Practice Essay NursingChild Care Business Plan Template Free

For example, a thesis in oral history and one in marketing may both use interview data that has been collected and analysed in similar ways, but the way the results of this analysis are presented will be very different because the questions they are trying to answer are different.

The presentation of results from experimental studies will be different again.

The effects of the major operating variables on the performance of the pilot filters are explained, and various implications for design are discussed. Literature Ph D thesis: The principal goal of the vernacular adaptor of a Latin saint's life was to edify and instruct his audience.

In this chapter I shall try to show to what extent our texts conform to vernacular conventions of a well-told story of a saint, and in what ways they had to modify their originals to do so, attempting also to identify some of the individual characteristics of the three poems.

I don't direct you in the wrong direction but I think it means drawing conclusion from your results and relate it to your study area.

its best to clarify with your university as I assume different universities will have they own meanings and expectations.If you have nothing to write, write 'I have nothing to write'. It probably won’t produce text you can use in your thesis, but it might help to clarify your ideas and show you ways to structure your argument. For some fields of study, the presentation and discussion of findings follows established conventions; for others, the researcher’s argument determines the structure.Therefore it is important for you to investigate the conventions of your own discipline, by looking at journal articles and theses.The first step is to clarify for yourself what you know now, as a result of your research. You could try highlighting key words, or identifying any points that need further investigation.David Evans and Paul Gruba (2002, p.112) remind us that our minds continue to work on problems when we aren't thinking about them consciously. The challenge for every thesis writer is to hold the detail of the data in focus without losing sight of the big picture of the research.This section is concerned with presenting the analysis of the results of data analysis.There is a great deal of disciplinary variation in the presentation of findings.Strength and area for improvement And then also future recommendations?Thanks Hi guys, what exactly goes into the discussion part of the dissertation as I've been told different things!So it is worth finding out what conclusions your brain has reached while you were collecting and analysing your data. This is why reporting data analysis is not enough; you need to:in order to make clear your contribution to knowledge in the field.Evans and Gruba suggest you try these techniques: 1. Now check the headings against your research question(s). Use these groups and headings to make a plan of the points you want to make in your discussion. This page and the next, on reporting and discussing your findings, deal with the core of the thesis.


Comments Masters Dissertation+Discussion

The Latest from ©