Hijackings, bombings, and assassinations on different continents of the world may seem like isolated attacks, but they reflect an easy reliance on violence as a way to promote social, political, and religious change.They are elements of a pervasive "end justifies the means" philosophy being followed to its most perverse conclusions.Tags: Layout For Research PaperNarrative Essays About FriendshipBrigham Young University Admissions EssayNewspaper Design Layout TermsWriting A Business Plan For A RestaurantChild Day Care Services Business PlanRubric Creative WritingEssay Examination Fear
In conclusion, both the terrorist groups and their host nations are truly enemies of the American government when they capture and kill U. civilians for military and foreign policy purposes. Based upon the Apostle Paul's teaching of government in Romans 13, terrorists should be classified as common criminals in their host countries.
But they are not prosecuted by host countries and are often carrying out the military policy and foreign policy of that country.
Governments who give sanctuary and even give approval have often adopted the attitude that terrorists do them no harm so why should they move against the terrorist organizations?
In fact, they are not seen as a threat because terrorist groups are acting out the host government's policies.
Any outside threat to the existence of the state is not a criminal threat but an act of war which is also to be dealt with by the government.
In other words, criminals threaten the state from within. In the case of seeking domestic peace, the Apostle Paul outlines how governments will approve of good works, but that governments should bring fear to those who are wrongdoers. But in the case at hand, terrorists do no live in fear of the governing authorities in the countries where they live. based anti-Syrian terrorist group would be illegal in the United States.But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath upon the one who practices evil." This passage of Scripture helps us make an important distinction we will use in our analysis of terrorism.The Apostle Paul's teachings on government shows that criminals are those who do evil and threaten the civil peace.Encouraged by their latest success, terrorists usually try again.Appeasement, Churchill wisely noted, always whets the appetite, and recent successes have made terrorists hungry for more attacks.Some news commentators have been unwilling to call terrorism what it is: wanton, criminal violence.They blunt the barbarism by arguing that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." But this simply is not true.Instead we are being victimized by an international terror network bent on crippling American morale. In Romans 13, the Apostle Paul says, "he who resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves.For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good.Many of these acts have been carried out by the members of Islamic Jihad, while others are part of an international network of terrorists.Claire Sterling argues in The Terror Network that many of the terrorists were trained and equipped by KGB agents from the former Soviet Union.