John Vande Berg, director of the Texas Biomedical Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, show little or no concern at all. Vande Berg, "I think of the chimpanzees in the same way that I think of a library.There are many books in the library that will never be used this year or next year ... But we don't know which ones will be needed tomorrow, next year or the year after." Oh my.People clearly want the benefits that derive from animal research.
John Vande Berg, director of the Texas Biomedical Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, show little or no concern at all. Vande Berg, "I think of the chimpanzees in the same way that I think of a library.There are many books in the library that will never be used this year or next year ... But we don't know which ones will be needed tomorrow, next year or the year after." Oh my.Tags: Homework Organizer TemplateEssay College Life Expected ExperiencedWhat Invention Did Vannevar Write About In A 1945 EssayCritical Thinking Skills Questions In MathematicsBest Research PapersText Features Of A Photo EssayHow To Develop A Small Business PlanChemical Engineering Research Papers
.pass_color_to_child_links a.u-inline.u-margin-left--xs.u-margin-right--sm.u-padding-left--xs.u-padding-right--xs.u-relative.u-absolute.u-absolute--center.u-width--100.u-flex-inline.u-flex-align-self--center.u-flex-justify--between.u-serif-font-main--regular.js-wf-loaded .u-serif-font-main--regular.amp-page .u-serif-font-main--regular.u-border-radius--ellipse.u-hover-bg--black-transparent.web_page .u-hover-bg--black-transparent:hover.
Content Header .feed_item_answer_user.js-wf-loaded .
This essay is adapted from one that appeared in Bekoff's column Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
People's relationships with other animals are a messy and confusing affair.
Over centuries humans have experimented with many different chemicals, products, and processes, with the final aim of bettering our conditions.
Testing products on animals most likely dates back centuries, however, in modern society it is a controversial point.We know, for example, from scientific research published in prestigious peer-reviewed journals, that mice, rats, and chickens display empathy and that rats like to be tickled and laugh, but they are still used and abused by the millions in various types of research and are protected by the Federal Animal Protection Act in the U. Indeed, those animals are not even considered to be animals.Appealing to, and extending, the precautionary principle to people's interactions with other animals, one can easily argue that society knows all we need to know right now to use such information on behalf of other animals.Many scientific, medical, and patient groups have come out strongly in favor of humanely conducted animal research.The National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine would like to add their voices to the chorus of support for animal research.I recently learned about a new website on Pro that is presents, in detail, both sides of the daunting and vexing question, "Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing?" We really need frank and open discussions about this question with which many people are wrestling.The majority of Americans agree that animal research must continue.But legislators rarely hear from this majority, whereas they are bombarded by appeals from the small minority who wish to stop or severely curtail such research.Below is an outline of circumstances when it could be considered acceptable and unacceptable.Firstly, it is clear that major advances in fighting disease, viruses and illnesses would not have been made without testing products on animals.