Core Critical Thinking Skills

Core Critical Thinking Skills-73
The Pennsylvania State University Study, under the direction of Dr.Elizabeth Jones, was funded by the US Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Instruction.

Tags: Levine Writing And Presenting Your Thesis Or DissertationPrimary School Essay On EnvironmentGoogle Bold Program EssayGallentry EssayistMalnutrition Research PaperCriminal Justice Term Paper TopicsWriting Prompts For Argumentative EssayWriting A Hypothesis For A Research Paper

How about judging an author*s or speakers credibility, comparing the strengths and weaknesses of alternative interpretations, determining the credibility of a source of information, judging if two statements contradict each other, or judging if the evidence at hand supports the conclusion being drawn?

Among the examples the experts propose are these: "recognizing the factors which make a person a credible witness regarding a given event or a credible authority with regard to a given topic," "judging if an argument*s conclusion follows either with certainty or with a high level of confidence from its premises," 2 The findings of expert consensus cited or reported in this essay are published in Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Facione, principle investigator, The California Academic Press, Millbrae, CA, 1990. In 1993/94 the Center for the Study of Higher Education at The Pennsylvania State University undertook a study of 200 policy- makers, employers, and faculty members from two-year and four- year colleges to determine what this group took to be the core critical thinking skills and habits of mind.

What about graphically organizing this essay, in your own way, knowing that its purpose is to give a preliminary idea about what critical thinking means?

The experts define evaluation as meaning "to assess the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person*s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships amongstatements,descriptions, questions or other forms of representation." Your examples?

What about, conducting a controlled experiment scientifically and applying the proper statistical methods to attempt to confirm or disconfirm an empirical hypothesis?

Beyond being able to interpret, analyze, evaluate and infer, good critical thinkers can do two more things.How about what you did above when you clarified what "offensive violence" meant?Again from the experts: analysis is "to identify the intended and actual inferential relationships among statements, questions, concepts, descriptions, or other forms of representation intended to express belief, judgment, experiences, reasons, information, or opinions." The experts include examining ideas, detecting arguments, and analyzing arguments as sub-skills of analysis.They can explain what they think and how they arrived at that judgment.And, they can apply their powers of critical thinking to themselves and improve on their previous opinions.In a sense this is critical thinking applied to itself.Because of that some people want to call this "meta-cognition," meaning it raises thinking to another level. Wiley Online Library requires cookies for authentication and use of other site features; therefore, cookies must be enabled to browse the site.Detailed information on how Wiley uses cookies can be found in our Privacy Policy.How about this: after judging that it would be useful to you to resolve a given uncertainty, developing a workable plan to gather that information?Or, when faced with a problem, developing a set of options for addressing it.


Comments Core Critical Thinking Skills

The Latest from ©