it didn’t exist because it’s apatosaurus and was acknowledged as such in 1903).The American Heritage Science Dictionary has the most concise explanation of the brontosaurus naming controversy I’ve seen so far: Take a little deception, add a little excitement, stir them with a century-long mistake, and you have the mystery of the brontosaurus. For 100 years this 70-foot-long, 30-ton vegetarian giant had two names.Tags: How Can I Write A Research PaperAp Lang Argument Essay 9Concluding An Essay Without Saying In ConclusionCreative Writing Competitions UkParaphrases In EssaysEssay On Cell Phones Being Allowed In SchoolReason For Mba EssayAnalyze Audience EssaySections In A Business PlanImportance Of Library Essay In Urdu
On soft substrate, the pressure from the feet of such dinosaurs would have distorted the earth at a depth of a metre or more beneath the surface…
Soon, apatosaurus was widely known as the “correct” and “scientific” name.
In “Bully for Brontosaurus,” Gould explains: I hate to be a shill for the Post Office, but I think that they made the right decision this time.
Since it is a rule in taxonomy that the first name given to a newly discovered organism is the one that must be used, scientists have had to use the term apatosaurus.
But “thunder lizard” had found a lot of popular appeal, and many people still prefer to call the beast brontosaurus., s.v.